Protap Nath

Barrister

Protap Nath is a public access qualified barrister

Overview

  • Protap is Public Access Qualified. He specialises in Family (Children Act and financial), immigration and employment matters.
  • Qualifications: BA (Hons), CPE Holborn College, Bar Vocational Course – Inns of Court School of Law
  • Year of qualification: 2003
  • Languages: Bengali (fluent), French (conversational)

Family practise

  • Children Act proceedings
  • Fact-finding hearings, Dispute Resolution Appointment (DRA) hearings, and final hearings
  • Matrimonial finance/financial remedies proceedings
  • First hearings, Financial Dispute Resolution (FDR), and final hearings
  • Advice on financial settlements
  • Protap is regularly instructed on behalf of parents and children in cases where there are significant and often entrenched disputes about where children should live and how much time they should spend with a non-resident parent. He has particular experience and expertise in cases involving domestic abuse.
  • Protap also regularly advises clients on Non-Molestation Orders, prohibited Steps Orders, Specific Issue Orders and Occupation Orders. His experience in family law, coupled with his immigration background, allows him to help clients where there are family and immigration cases. He is often instructed by solicitors to assist in these types of proceedings.

Immigration practise

  • Article 8, human rights & family application
  • ILR & nationality issues
  • Deportation
  • Sponsored working & business
  • EEA
  • Administrative Review applications
  • Appeals to the immigration tribunals and courts against Home Office decisions
  • Judicial review claims against Home Office decision.

Employment practise

  • Unfair dismissal
  • Discrimination
  • Whistleblowing
  • Employment Tribunal claims and hearings
  • Protap has experience in all areas of employment law. He has appeared before the Employment Tribunal in lengthy trials. Protap has a dynamic ability to communicate and can often settle matters to the client’s advantage before a hearing takes place.
  • Recent cases include:
  • Securing the strike out of a claim for race discrimination and constructive unfair dismissal.
  • Successfully defending a claim of unfair dismissal brought against a large service industry operator following an unsuccessful flexible working request.
  • Succeeding in a claim for disability discrimination relating to home-working – failure to make reasonable adjustments and discrimination arising from disability.

Our Services

Demstone Chambers is led by specialist Barristers, supported by a team of OISC accredited immigration representatives and chambers assistants.

Contact us for help

Latest News

Occupation orders: an overview

Part IV of the Family Law Act 1996 enables a court to make an occupation order, broadly, where a person is suffering or is likely to suffer harm or domestic violence.

Whistleblowing claims: an overview

Whistleblowing is the common term for what, in technical legal terms, employment lawyers would define as a worker being subjected to a “detriment” because they have made a “protected disclosure.” Under section 43A of the Employment Rights Act 1996, such claims broadly comprise four elements:

Race discrimination: what is it?

The Equality Act 2010 (“the EA 2010”) protects employees against discrimination, harassment, and victimisation based on a “protected characteristic”. One protected characteristic is race. This short article provides an overview of the key concepts in race discrimination claims.